Sunday, October 14, 2012

On Network Marketing


This post was inspired by my dispute with one of my neighborhood pals (well at least I think we're pals) and will include my experience regarding network marketing: basically I'm offering the pool (or puddle) of knowledge on the business model and practices of network marketing that, I am confident enough, most people would find familiar, owing to its great prevalence as a “get-rich-easy” scheme.

What is Network Marketing?

Network marketing, as it is generally known, is the marketing strategy in which a sales force receives compensation through the direct sale of products, complemented by the sales generated by their recruits (hence the term networking). This business model is closely associated with pyramid schemes in the Philippines, as both have very similar frameworks of operation (at least from my perspective) with the latter often disguised as the former. But to make the distinction, pyramid schemes offer less/insignificant benefit/s to participants the further down the system they are recruited (though it can be pointed out that network marketing is also susceptible to this distinction, I am not going to argue about it here).

While passing time at the park together with familiar faces, this pal I've mentioned in the beginning of this post, offered me a FREE discount card. This card, by an obscurely named company (Lioness?), would allow me to avail of products and services with the, I'd like to say, affiliated companies/groups, boasting a discount rate up to 26%. With such a simple yet favorable extension of goodwill, one would raise doubts on the mechanics behind such an offer for after all, one does not simply come by free goodies in this world. Sensing something else in play, I probed this friend of mine for the catch, if any at all. Hesitating for a moment, he described the terms of usage, and inadvertently, some details on how he got into the business: revenue is generated by a percent (1%) charged for every purchase with the card, additionally, 5% (of what? And what is this charged from?) is gained for every recruit. Basically, he has been recruited to distribute the discount card/product, with the “recipient/potential recruit” gaining the option of getting in on the business. By now, I should have done the job of making this familiar to you, reader.

Piecing together the bricks of this scheme, I declined his offer. When asked why I declined, I reasoned that it was network marketing and most possibly lurking in it a pyramid scheme. He concurred to the possibility, but told me that I would be better off having the card with me since I can still avail of the perks without recruiting or just not use the perks altogether. Though my mind was set, I could not properly retort what he said when I pointed out that ultimately the discount card encouraged me to spend, not to save (it lacked backing and good analogies, possibly because I just got off work). Before the discussion became heated, I retreated home with the lingering suspicion that the system he was willingly part of is rigged.


The Risks

So what are the pitfalls of the discount card? Given the chance to polish my points, I've come up with answers that I think are competent enough to address my concerns. First on my point that discount cards don't give any real benefit to the user. There is an interesting phenomenon when prices become lower, making products/services affordable, thereby available to consumers: instead of saving on products that are otherwise at higher prices, you tend to spend more because they are available in the short term. When a product is on sale, people tend to buy it in groups, driving up the demand with the increase in volume. The same can be said of the discount card: you are inclined to buy, possibly in bulk, because they are cheaper. It's actually riskier to have a discount card than getting products that are on sale/discounted: instead of people availing of products at a lower price, they can get them lower anytime via the card. The result is that people tend to spend more frequently, on top of spending more than they should, than they would, often buying things they may not need or need right away.

There are two privileges that comes with the card: a) Discounts (but as I showed not really an advantage) and b) Revenue via recruitment and recruit sales. Let's apply this to different scenarios one can be involved with:

  1. A: X uses the discount card to buy and to recruit.
  2. B: X uses the discount card only to buy.
  3. C: X uses the discount card only to recruit.
  4. D: X no perks are used (card is not kept/card is kept but not used).

Let's examine A. As I've mentioned earlier, you are in the mindset that you're saving more but not realizing you're increase in expenses. The question then is: is the revenue generated actually worth it? One problem to take note is that the revenue depends on whether or not the card is being used by other people. No expense, no income. Another is the fact that though the revenue is variable, in the long run is insignificant. The amount you gain diminishes the lower you are in the pyramid scheme (I'm going to make the distinction that this is a pyramid scheme as I see no opportunity to be promoted up the chain). B is much worse since you're only spending without getting compensated/rewarded. C arguably is the best strategy to take if one wants to make money in this business though however small the income may be. But if C is the best strategy why did I opt for D? I will cover this at the end of this post.


Objections

Now, one may come out and say that pointing out that the kept card may never be used at all undercuts the discount incentive objection: if it can be shown that even when given the incentive, people may not choose to spend more or to spend more frequently when given the opportunity, then the force of the objection weakens. I would say not at all. For various reasons, one may not use the card, and perhaps never at all. For instance, you may want to purchase items with it but find that the card is not honored in the establishment or the products are not related to the affiliated companies. In other words one may not always have the opportunity to use the card. Furthermore, this does not actually deal with the problem of the discount card; users of the card spend just to get the discount, not really minding how often or how much they are spending. The same can be said of a gun: guns can kill people whenever they are used. Conversely, they can never kill when not used. The problem arises 'whenever' the card is used, not 'if' the card is ever used at all.


Cleaning up

Upon further reflection, I am comfortable with D because I did not want to be associated with this product. If we look at how revenue is generated, it is flawed and presents no real end benefit as you examine the ranks of the pyramid scheme. Even the way the product is distributed does not sit well with me. If I'm allowed to keep the card but pledge not to use it, then why should I keep the card? Why would you want to give it to me knowing full well that I would not use it in any way? There is this tacit expectation that anyone who is in possession of this card would end up using it anyway, even those who profess to never use it would be tempted if need be. Otherwise, they would just offer it to those who are interested in using it. That is just devious, more devious than the usual scams that require payment. With this distribution platform, people can generate income without ever having to sell a product (excluding the recruitment package) or lend a service, by the FUCKLOADS, just by relying on this notion. No work equals profit. Even then when you recruit others, what are you equipping them? The opportunity to distribute cards that enables the frenzied urges of the consumer? Is that a service? It's a disservice: you need to oversell the concept that it's always better to spend with a discount card, which I can't stress enough is actually detrimental, over budgeting expenses. You have to incorporate this lie that it's legitimate because of the companies affiliated with the marketing company which perforce legitimizes the business practice of the scam.

If ever the tendrils of a networking scheme slithers up to you, do not hesitate to ask for details. It will save you a whole lot of trouble.